The architecture is all about buildings is I right or n to don’t offence me at the very beginning….. The architecture is all about creating living spaces for the human kin d and let them survive in the planet for another few centuries.The architect all the time talks about this spatial progression + the philosophical background to demonize the power of the architecture. The compromising in the sense is good , no argument with that but the my biggest question is the architecture is only element which address only the spatial progression of the build nag or the living dose which we are suppose to live.
What I believe is the architecture should introduce the technology to live in the planet. After the long time the standers of the space is same none of them couldn’t developed the architecture technology. We stucked in a box where the upper part of the box is transparent where we see the future and wee imagine things which are impossible but we still afraid to change the pattern of the building.
Do you really now what happen to the logic science the logic science was we developed in the Greek era and after that nobody interested to develop or research on logic science, so now the logic science like a small child but mathematics is well grown man. Like that we are demonizing in the universities that this is the most best thing WOW “”””” spatial progression”””””” learn how to do it….
I totally believe that the grand pa Geoffrey bawa s’ time has gone; we have to think something new to create the new world of architecture for the goodness of the society and the future.
By chameera Udawatthe
The idea of neurotic architecture is the process of designer doesn’t response to the four major manufactures of they designs aspects to create the designs. Actually the expression be supposed to be the architecture doesn’t response to any other qualities of the context or the client or the user in any stage of the design process. So the design became no utilize at the end of the design progression elementary unable to serve architecture to anybody. Except the idea of the neurosis on the designer would be conversed forever in the history, not because they made good thing or design good designs for the society but they destroyed the built environment. The idea is “we make money not designs” whatever they do they think that this is the ideal design and best thing that they can make for the goodness of the society. As the Lawrence kubie challenge the neurotics can not create creative things they can create whatever they want. But in fact the neurotic architecture is none useful and the survival of the building are due to the lack of designs sense in the society. The neurotic is not radical architecture. Radical architecture is changing forma and shapes in to the goodness of the deign aspects, but the neurotic architecture doesn’t understand the requirements of the design aspects. Radical is something deeply routed in the ground, the radical; represent the post notion of the history, therefore the radical architecture is not neurotic architecture, don’t mess with radical architecture and neurotic architecture when you are classifying architecture. And also creating whatever you want to make is not the creative process of deigning. The client will never say that this is the site and this is money do whatever you want to do and create architecture. Architecture is lot more complex process and a lots of dirty works to be done there. Compromising is the start point of the architecture and it ahs a lots of dirty works until the design process end the. In fact there are plenty of neurotic architects in the country and none of them can be clearly define as the neurotic architecture. Most of buildings are responding to something other than just buildings... However the neurotic architecture can make nothing and give nothing to the society. And also the neurotic architecture has no creativity there are just building. Neurotic architecture refers to those who cannot create but they are overwhelming that they can change the whole world for the goodness of their own.
In Sri Lankan context most of the architect are responding to the context” the building d3ebit the character of the location. Therefore it is difficult to identify the pure neurotic architecture in the island. But there is such strength architecture in country. Because the eastern idea of the contextual adaptation an important fact in the philosophy of the architects in the country. The influences from the old regions of Sri Lankan history had killed the existing neurotic architects and destroy the Everest climbing ideas before they exit with solid base. And also Sri Lanka context has no idea of what is radical architecture is? So there is no pure neurotic architecture in this small island but there some pig big headed architecture which are not responding to the design aspect which should be addressed.
“Literature and classics are an indispensible tool for the intuitively inclined architect and architectural instructor”
The good architecture like a poet it has the rhythm and flow tuned with codes. It must address the aspects of imagination and creativity. The creativity is the cognition of the edifice. The poetics of the architecture represent the evolutions of this poet for the benefits of the good architecture. In this book represent the theory of architecture which is derived from the human thought, a deals with the nature like of the metaphorical thoughts of the humanity.
The whole premise of this book is that architectural contemplation, the architecture contemplation quit good and benefits for the user and it has the methods of design journeying, and in due course architecture as built nowadays are much wealthier than they were during the earlier part of the century, the period of the Modern movement. The book explains little bit about the development of the contemporary architecture in the world. It explore the original theories of Modernism and Postmodern design and attempts to bring together all that is meaningful in these two movements into a new inclusivity attitude toward architecture. Anthony C Antoniades looks at the many intangible and tangible channels one can yoke in creating architectural design. By opening architecture eyes to full fill the mind and heart in to the goodness of the spirituality is the best climax to the full range of creative influence, he tries to explain the readers manufacture designs that are richer on spatial, sensual, spiritual, and environmental levels. The richness is the key of making classification of good architecture. Classification is very important in the end to identify what is good and what is bad? And also the classification helps to create good architecture. Most of the channels in the book directly address the intangible elusive channels of creativity spirituality of architecture metaphor and what is metaphor, “the ironic consideration of the creative building on the earth”. And the writer deal with historical background of the exotic and multicultural tradition of the architecture should be used in the applications. Among the touchable channels covered in the book are the historical precedents to explain the rhythm of the geometry and development of the metaphorical background of the architecture in the world. The author presented a rich and imaginative discussions of these various channels, explaining which are were favored during the Modern and Postmodern movements and classifying his theoretical analysis through the use of many vivid examples, tables and illustrations. Included among the examples in the volume are many distinguished projects and theories by a wide range of noted architects such as Utzon, Barragin, Asplund, Pietila, Aalto, Legarreta, Predock, and Pikionis, who are latecomers to the attention of the media. It summarizes the findings and transformation in biology and the theory of knowledge and suggests an architectural analogue. It concludes with a suggestion for a transformational attitude via the methodology of simultaneity. In this book poetry and literature are portrayed as two powerful vehicles to architectural design. According to the author a designer should have a “poetic palette” that includes local as well as universal ingredients. He has discussed about the cross-culture fertilization which leads to the birth of the exotica. He addressed both the “physical” and “metaphysical” nature of exotica. Also he discussed about the multicultural nature of recent educational trends that has brought the element of the exotic into the design studio. The categories of exotic design exercises are presented, along with projects from the author’s personal experience. Author says that Architectural history is the qualitative degree of difference that distinguish architects among themselves, that’s the turning point of the changing the creative channels of the architecture in the world. The author made a great conversation to explain what the architecture history is and hat is architecture historicism, and obtainable arguments for the right use of both good and bad architecture. He defined the “brand” admiration of the history as contrasting to the “bias” of architecture historicism. What is important of the history and basic use of the history as architecture? The book says how we should deals with the historical precedent which provide to create creativity or imitate what we had in the past. The author negotiates the concept of the accurate use of architecture history, and made suggestions for selecting the right sort of precedents. Sir Anthony C. Antoniades accomplished that to look upon the style, the needed architecture sense toward the historical background of the concept. And also he converse the indeed response toward the responsibility of architecture with the historical clues of good Architecture. The book covers the source, definitions, and opposing attitudes of scholars and aesthetes on mimicking the goodness of architecture, truthful interpretation deal with the philosophical liberation of architecture science o, and their associated concepts imitation, origination. One should be cautious when creating through this channel, and adopt the attitude of “implement ability” as a way to safeguard against the dangers of misuse while achieving useful ends from both mimesis and literality.
It addresses the supremacy of geometric over analytical depiction, and the reasons for the appeal of geometry over the years. The early emphasis of aesthetes on geometry was partial, with a focus on elevations, proportional systems, and the concept of “symphonic composition”. It also discusses about the relationship of the various building types and their corresponding fit with geometry and the concept of “geometric fields” is viewed through both historical examples and contemporary complex building types. The caution he gave is that geometry can be misused when the emphasis is on form as opposed to the inclusivity concerns.
Author gave extraordinary concentration to the construction materials, selection and their proper use. He talks that the language of the architecture and letters of the architecture is materials we used to create good architecture. The advantage of the advance science of the architecture comes from the goodness of the material science. The development of the material usage is the development of the architecture; the risk all the historical buildings took made the elusive transformation to the development of the architecture to the contemporary architecture. He talks about the tangible things in the architecture, it’s like a body flushness blood and bones of the architecture are the materials which we used to create good architecture on the earth. To him material is everything to create anything. The Modern and Postmodern movements fluctuate with look upon to the criterion of material science. The post modernism is the time when the new materials came to the theater and play big roles in the architecture. In fact the fact between the developments of the architecture lies behind the goodness of the material science. His discussion focuses on the use of materials is the best way of creating god architecture. He says the knowing the material science is the door to the successful architecture. The best example for this is the post modernism. The post modernism shows the rapid development of material science and parallel developments in the architecture. To him successful architects are such as H.H.Richardson, Frank Lloyed Wright, Louis I.Kahn, and Alvar Aalto. Author suggested for the enrichment of design education by extra emphasis on materials through their incorporation into design studio work. The author converse the advantage of knowing the material science for the survival o the good architecture, therefore he says the architecture education should be developed with studio works an material works which are more practical to the construction science . He says studying architecture all about studying how to deal with the materials for the goodness of the architecture of the world.
In the end Antoniades made a great effort to understand the meaning of good architecture and tried to explain the goodness of the architecture to us. His revival of poetics of architecture deepens and sharps our mind and the heart to sense the good architecture in the world. And also the book helps to understand and classify the goodness of the architecture. Therefore he had succeeded to write and converse the all the necessary element of the architecture and historical back ground of the architecture. His negotiation toward the elementary science of the architecture and his understand of each and every element of the architecture is good for us. I believe all the architecture students should read this book to understand the goodness of the architecture and create good grammar in architecture science.
And the best part of this book is he had given wonderful examples to prove what he believe in the architecture and he gave good fight to prove what he believe. Yes, in front of a society you should give fight and say what I believe is right, in the book he had put a lots of photographs of not building but studio models and students works of architecture. He always tried connecting the architecture education and the general works of the architectural functions in the world.
Whatever, the great philosophy he had written and communicated in the book, my conclusion is; he lacks the sense of social aspects in the architecture and connection between the metaphor and the eye of the viewer change from the place to place. He had no explanation on the correlation between the society and architecture; he had understood the architecture as a single source work apart from the society. Even thou he had converse the material science and connection between the materials and the architecture he lacked to make a good conversation to prove the great connection between the architecture and the society. Therefore I believe the poetics of architecture is not an ideal book to understand the architecture science it is a European explanation of the architecture as science which deals with only the materials. Well the other things are the psychological aspects of designing process. Antonio is not a machine therefore he should have a sense of creativity and the way of singing song according to the patterns of humanity but in the book no idea of psychological aspects which we should considerably act to create good architecture. But in the other side the architecture is something deals with society and the psychological aspects of the society. If he had explained those things too I believe that the poetics of architecture is a great book to understand the architecture. Highly original base on solid principles of architecture and architectural education, the poetics of architecture help you to understand and widen your own ideas of creative and in the studio works. It will also deepen you mind and souls to taste and sense the good architecture. And the book help to compromise to appreciate of the creative process and the design process with many influences to develop the architecture. The student orientation of the book is very important for you to understand the architecture education but the other hand you should also try to understand the benefits of the sensing good architecture. This book doesn’t let you understand what is good architecture but it does let you sense what is good architecture. Therefore as an architecture student you should read this book not only once twice and understand the essence of the architecture and the poetics of architecture. However after all inspire from the book and start sings your own song.
Tourist guide to Historical buildings in mount Lavinia
St Thomas College is one of the historical school in the island and it had fabricated many of the eminent Sri Lankans to the ground of the Sri Lanka. The chapel of the college is one of the historical chapels in the country made in 1852. At that time the big city Mount Lavinia was just a fishing hamlet. The transfiguration of the chapel of S. Thomas’ College, Mt. Lavinia towers majestically from the highest knoll of the campus - a silent witness to the thoughts and prayers, and the hopes and aspirations of generations of Thomian schoolboys, who have trodden its long familiar aisles for over fifty years.
The chapel is in the sea side of the Galle road near the loin gate if you ask from anybody where the St thamas College is is you can easily locate the college and chapel. To enter the college you need to get a special permission because the chapel is in side of the college premise and contacting the warden is the best way to get the permission to enter the building.
The actual chapel entrance should be from the sea side and the contrast of the chapel also illustrate from the sea side of the location. However the building eructed from the ground like the soil and earth had extracted from the earth and stood to show the power and supremacy of the god. The advance of the chapel is it contained the character of the, location as same as the character of the spirituality. Spiritual architecture is the key of making faith on the heart of the delegator. So the chapel does the same and it emphasizes the faith. The faith did start dwelling inside of my heart after watching the building even thou I’m a great buddist. The interior of the building double the dwelled faith and the height of the ceiling displayed the length you have to go seek the god and the enlighten of the life. But the furniture arrangement of the chapel is not suit and even the color of the furniture contrast the beauty of the building in terms of the architectural condition of the building. But windows and large door made me dwarf in side of the chapel. But I stood to understand the imagining capacity of the architect to create this building.
In fact this is a British oriented building with the character of the building debit the character of the vermicular architectural qualities of the Sri Lanka architecture. The pillar located in front of the chapel to enter the building is the key to say this and the roof also a significant to building. The architect of the building had concentrated on the topography of the location specially the rain and wind directly comes from the sea side. He had not used single iron bar to create the building because of the uniform corrosion due to the saltiness of the wind. Sand rock and cement became the main material element which he had used to make the building and he was knee on the aquatic condition of the chapel interior.
After all the spirit of the building ring the bell of my heart and it started to sing until I write this review on the chapel. I like if you have a chance go and dwell your faith and the wisdom of the mind and the heart and enjoy the historical architecture of this small island.
By Chameera udawatthe
Children are everything in the world there are the world and there are the future of the world and they can make whatever they want to make in the future. Whatever they do, want to make them happy. Happiness is the key of their life. When they have something they are happy with, when they are happy they create and draw it correctly. And that is where the world is beautiful and the future is gorgeous. You can see from the basic drawing to the colored finished piece. Enjoy! Here some great paintings from the art competition.
(This is not my philosophy this is what I believe precise)
Content
1.Fight between us and nature
2.Evolution is not yet end
3.Mutation
4.The transform in the world?
5.Chameleon change colour
6.Why chameleon
7.iamanalien@rocketmail.com
8.Can alien save the world?
9.Emotion generating architecture
10.Emotions and architecture
11.There is nor god or any spirituality in the world.
12.Why robotics and mechanics?
13.I will make artificial chameleon
14.Who am I poem
1.Fight between us and nature
We are here after a billion year of an evolution process; it is very hard to imagine the road from bacteria to a well organized human body. We are here standing as a human without fear and endurance to the nature, none now living creature can challenge the human kind. Its power is wide and trigger than the bacteria never though of what we are going to be in billion years after coming out of the ocean. But in fact we still have more time to go more time to fight with nature and make our future more and more challengeable to the nature, the environment. Every body says the nature should be protected; yes I agree with that nature should be protected but not for the survival of the environment or the survival of the human nature in the earth. But whenever we will stop challenging, the environment sooner the environment start striking toward the human nature in destructive methods. In fact I believe that challenging the nature is the human passion and the rear force which motivate the human civilization on to forward. The war between the nature human kinds is the function of the development of the human civilization. I have no arguments with that ,we should destroy the nature and make this world much more safer for the human kind without zero force from the nature of the earth, if one day the earth might not be enough for us then we can find another place where we can generate our colony, that’s is ok. That is why we call our selves we are kinds of bacteria generating from numerously. In fact that’s what we had been doing in the Past to make the earth greater for the human kind. We cant reach to the top without help I believe there may be an alien influence for the reason why we are here walking with stand as walking animal, and in most cases people don’t figure that out the changes in the world or the changes in the nature make forward us in to the great world and we are here due to the power of the human kind taken out by the battle between the nature and the human civilization. What else we can do what else can the nature do to stop the growth of the human bacteria in the world, those are un scalable and beyond the our thinking capacity but we know only one thing that we are not going fail in front of the nature and we are going change the whole world to make it a better place for the human notion and whole human kind. I have no love toward the environment we should protect the nature to survive our selves we want the rare animals too, we want grasses plants and all the other living things to live and without them we can’t survive. So what we should do we can not fight with the nature without adapting ourselves to face the natural problems in the world we can not move forward the world without adapting the human body to change the nature. Until now in the whole human history what we had been doing was adapting our mind and the body to fight with the nature we want to survive in the earth forever that’s why we migrate from the sea to land that’s why we change our body to rational man that’s why we adapted to walking with two legs that’s why we started wearing clothes and the adaptation is every where we can not imagine the future adaptations.
2.Evolution is not yet end
Most of the scientist realized that the evolution process is already, the mutation process is already over we are the last human kind and this is the last human body we are caring forever, but I believe the evolution process is not over yet, all the evolution adaptations which we made in the biological past of the human history are kinds of adaptation or a mutation in the human body, but after the growth of the homo sapiens brain after the growth of the thinking brain of the human body we started adapting and mutating in a better way of to face the nature. every invention which we made to face natural problem every creation or every designs here to face the natural problems f the nature, so why we are here due to the timeless in venations and creation of the past like that we are still changing our mind and why we are still inventing machines and equipments to challenge the nature. The nature will not give up we also same we are not here if some of our ancestors failed to face the nature, there fore I believe that all the electrical equipments and all the machinery things and even the condoms were created due to the endless battle between the nature and human brand. Can you imagine the path we came from the sea before four billion years ago can you imagine the path we came to the see can you imaging the hardships which we made in the past of the life, but we are still the most stupid bacteria in the whole universe. After we become a bacteria after we become the frog after we become monkey after we become standing monkey what you call intelligent man we think that we are in the positive of the civilization, no we are not yet stopped all the stories of battles all the stories in the old school hand book is a poet now we should start imagining the future and we should imaging what should be the next mutation in the world now we should start what we should do for the survival of the human specie. Very time when we see the start in the sky we trying to reach the moon or shoot the moon and take the moon in to the earth, that’s the human nature we want every thing generate the human kind we want everything generate the human bacteria, not even in the whole universe when we realized that there are more that one universe we felt very happy that we have another space to generate the human civilization, we started to become more after and efficient to reach the sky , that’s the human nature, human nature should not be stop . A cosmic attack can not stop the survival of the life in the earth unlike.
3.Mutation
Mutation was the key of our survival when we realized that the food in the ocean is not enough we started migrated from the ocean to land when we realized that the we should catch animal and live we started to became eating meats etc like that every problem we found a solution in the nature by adapting in certain way we started changing our body we started changing everything for the survival of the life. The survival, in fact the survival is indeed and the nature of human kind goes with the survival of the human kind. What is the end shall we end with an alien attack we still don’t know what is the failing point of the human kind we don’t know when we are going to fail in the future we don’t know when we fail in the future but we can imaging and change the world. Most of the worlds’ changing situations came after strategy of survival. Everybody fighting for their own survival everybody looking for their survival, not even us all the living things in the nature fighting for their survival, that’s what we should understand. The earth can be change one day and the whole world can be changing one due to continued existence fight of the living things in the earth. Therefore what we should understand adopting is the best way of survive in the world and also everything in the world should adapt to the changes in the world in certain manner.
I’m an architecture student still like a growing sow I actually don’t have a proper philosophy I still don’t know how to express the philosophy and tell somebody that this is my philosophy but I can tell you what I believe in the world what I like to do in the world. I like when the whole world can adopt to solve all the problems in the earth. Perhaps we don’t need a magic answer all the problems are the world we don’t need a god will and power to change the world: god is crazy”, all we should do is change ourselves and adapt to the nature. As an architecture student we deal with building re the third skin of the human body we design the third skin of the human kind. Therefore the third skin is very important for the human survival. How greater if the third skin also adopt too
4.The changes in the world?
Don’t mess with what I said we always change our cloth we change the material we change the colure we change the mood of the clothes why? We want to be comfortable we want the physiological physical and spiritual comfort; therefore we change the second skin all the time trying to be good in the world. But our skin can not be change like this the third skin is always solid something it can’t move It can’t change the shape colour and the form. No adaptation. Its like a game a game for survival we all are players everyday we play against the nature everyday we start to think against the nature everyday realize that we can not fight with the nature but we keep fighting. And also mankind never survive with the ideal happiness .I believe that as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. We akin to suffering we reminiscent of fall in and see what is in the ground we like fall in and see how deep the hole is, we are like honey bees, the romance and irrationality of the human mind is the movement of the human fruition. All the hormones and organs are with us to make the wheel move forward. It is very difficult to imagine a wonderful world for the human kind without sufferings; we are totally different therefore it is very hard to imagine a building environment mankind. I have not understand any of them in the world I still cant understand whom is my father and hat he speaks about, so understanding society is very difficult and hard so I’m not going to understand the society I’ll do what I have to do in the society and expire as soon as possible without harming to the mankind.
5. Chameleon change colour
I love colours; colures are the expression of the world colour can make the whole world beautiful. And also the feelings derived from the colour can change the whole world and solve all the problems in the world. For me use colour like a tuning music in to a great creation. Sometimes I play crazy with colour and I went mad with certain types of colour. Its like all the change in the world colour can change the function of the situation colour can express the function of the situation. Chameleon changes colour and camouflage to the nature and try to adapt it sleeves to the surrounding environment. How come the nature? The nature uses colors to the survival.
6.Why chameleon
Chameleon is the only animal can adapt in to the surround nature immediately, the speed of the mutation is quick and unbelievable. When we were small colour changing animals are like a mist and we used search and look at them how they are changing the colour and the pattern of the body. It was very interesting and also the curiosity woven with it was wonderful. Colours are the elusion which combines the eye and the outer world, the form and all the other things seen due the visual effect of the colours, unlike another thing colour relate with the psychology, it deals with feeling and derive feelings to make forms. I like colours I like expression of colours can express the freshness and idealness of the mind and enlighten of the mind. The lord Buddha had gloomed seven colours after enlighten, because he had the wisdom and the power. Therefore the rainbow or free colours can express the freedom and the independency of the mind. So I love using colours without fear and I like multi colours and colours like pink, violet, blue magenta and yellow. I have no specialties in using colour for the design whenever I want use colours I use them to the design and make the designs more and more colorful. That’s why I don’t like Buddhism in Hindus they use multi colours and make their architecture more and moiré wonderful, their temples are full of fresh colours; I like that (crazy Idea 1) .I love the way the chameleon change the body colour according to the surrounding colours, I like to create architecture or wall like that can change the colour it self. (Crazy idea 2)The adaptation is the key of survival, the change and the face of the change toward the changes in the environment is the key of the survival in the world. So everything we design and everything creates should be adaptable to the environment and the nature. My idea is to create architecture which can adapt the form and shape it selves to the goodness of the survival.
7.iamanalien@rocketmail.com
I think I am an alien yes I am (Crazy idea 3). We started the mutation process already we are adapting to the nature faster than we did when we were Homo erectus, we move the evolution process faster than what we think who we are? So I think the next step should be an alien mood I think I am an lien and I can lot more better than the homo sapiens sapiens does, I think I am faster than the homo sapiens. So I like to think my self as a mutant or Xavier to the world. I like dreaming thing which are impossible to do in the world and think this application can be possible. Dreaming (crazy Idea 4) is the number one and realization process is the number two in the life me to survive in the world. I believe I can do anything and create whatever thing; only the problem is the sources. The abilities of the human scale is unbelievable, so far so we arrived to this step what we have crated due to the passion of braveness in the mind and heart of our ancestors. We read fictions because we enjoy the emotional responses it generates. Through fictions, we candlelight at a clever and subtle use of language, deeply sympathize with characters, or marvel at allot twist. Even tragic stories are, in some sense are enjoyable. Feelings motive us to engage with other dramatic media as well: we go to the theater, watch films, and play videogames enlarge part to feel emotions. Yet, the wide variety of media and the emotions they cause challenge our ability to understand exactly how media generate emotions.
8.Can alien save the world?
This is what I believe there should be another developed world out there some where else and they will come to the earth sooner than we think, they may change the world and help us to develop the world like British came to this island and developed the country. The aliens are like missionaries who help to develop the world and they will be saviors to the world until we survive in the world. I believe they will come and change the world and help us to develop the world. I love to be an alien or I like to fall in love with an alien. That why I like Africans.
9.I love Africa
Africans have the most closet genes related to the alien I believe that the Africans are far more powerful and stronger than the Caucasoid they can do much more better than what they are today. One day I‘ll marry an African woman and generate (crazy idea 4). I love the freedom that I have and the freedom of the expression in the country. I’m more self sufficient with ideas and I’m more independent when I am designing, may be I’m a crazy guy who has nothing and trying to make nothing out of nothing. But I still dreaming “going to Africa and find nice tall women (Ethiopia is the best) and free of gene mix and taking her into the island and live in the country.
10.Emotion generating architecture
In this paper, I argue that current theories are inadequate for mistrustfully understanding our emotional responses to artworks. I propose an alternate theory that suggests we can understand our emotional responses to art by integrating a multi-level theory of mind with an analysis of the key differences between representational media and reality. Based on this theory, I present a model of emotion that can both describe our affective responses to a wide variety of representational media and help us compare different types of media in terms of their ability to generate emotions in different ways. Emotions are the expression of the hormones of the body, how we react; how we response; to the changes in the world due to the harmonic action and reactions in the body. We can not control the hormones and change the factors in the body to be unusual to the ground. But we can think rational and logical pattern to change the situation for the goodness of the life, if we live and world of we are trying to change ion the world. Life witout emotions are useless.
11.Emotions and architecture
Emotions are constructive, with out emotions there is no architecture the emotions are the language of the architecture without deep emotions how can you feel the architecture. Consequently the architecture should make emotions or make harmonic activities in human body. I am a believer in story making architecture. We are all about to struggle with emotions that are the progress of the humanity. I believe the architecture should speak the architecture should make loud noises to the mind and heart ; I don’t mind the language that the architecture use the architecture can be very technological or the architecture can jus walls and roof but I believe the building should make rumor to the mind and it should be remind in the heart forever. Emotional architecture is the radical architecture, radical acrhi3ecture can only make history or the radical architecture is mute in the history. So I believe the conservative architecture does nothing but make brick buildings.
12.There is nor god or any spirituality in the world.
Yes the Google is right the “god is crazy” or what believe is crazy. why we believe in god because we think we are weak we think there somebody or something can help to the human kind to change the way live and save us from the sadness and trouble we are facing every day life in the earth. In fact the idea is wrong there are only us there only us to save ourselves and change the word. As I mention we don’t need a magic to solve all the problems in the world we have enough power and the ability to change the world top the goodness of the graciousness of the future. We’ve all had times in our lives when we’ve performed at our peak, times when we’ve felt fully alive, when we’ve been living in the moment, so absorbed by what we’ve been doing that nothing else has mattered.
Each of us has unique talents we were born with. When we become aware of what they are and use them on a daily basis, we feel inspired and we inspire others, we are trying to change other selves to goodness of ourselves it the nature or Sinhalese nature. We are able to make a valuable contribution in the world and to lead more fulfilling lives. Every day becomes an adventure - exciting, inspiring, fulfilling. Therefore I don’t like to mess my architecture with the spirituality, spirituality is a lie or a mist I don’t want use mist to make my architecture elusive. And also the spirituality can increase the emotions in to a bad passion I don’t like building Pagodas. This is the secret of happiness and it is possible for everyone. It is not the preserve of the few. You too can realize your potential by discovering what it is you do magnificently, what it is you were born to do and what no one else can do quite like you. So I am very rational in the sense to think that the god is not out there to help us to the freedom of the world it is very happy to say that I am alone in the world and only my father and mother can help me to get something done. The idea of there is no god or no spirituality comes from my father in most cases my entire attitude is related with what my father believes.
13.Why robotics and mechanics?
Most of my designs are dealing with mechanical things. Because most of my dreams not practicable with the existing technology and the existing science available in the earth. I love new technologies can make the life much easier and faster. I love the fast and speed .I likes to be flash (crazy idea 7) in affect I am like flash roaming around the town faster and watching what going on so so sos. With new science and robotic technology I would like converse about human responsive architecture to the world, in fact this is all the effort of this report. Which means the architecture or the living space is more adoptive to the dwellers of the space and the form or the rhythm of the space continuously adapting to the goodness of the users. This is the end this is what I want to create in the future this is the idea of modern architecture, human responsive architecture. In the history of the architecture most of the architects were trying to create spaces more and more functional to the user or the context. The only problem was to identify the user. But there should be logical connection to understand the user; if we can find the logical connection between the user and space then easily we can make human feeling responsive architecture to the world. But we need robotic architecture. The technology will be not being enough to make these kinds of architecture. But this is the future. As I declared to you the future is unimaginable we can not utter the limits of the human adaptation toward the nature, hence we just can not say this category of architecture is not possible in the future. In conclusion to all the idea is to create mutation in the architecture or living spaces which can automatically response to the nature and fight with the battle of survival I will make artificial chameleon…… yes; my idea is to create living spaces which can adopt to the nature automatically and change the shape and form toward the goodness of the survival. However this is the end of the speech my initiation is to create good architecture which is more adaptive to human scale or more functional to the human mind and amend it selves to the goodness of the future of the whole human civilization.
